On my recent visit to the Norman Rockwell Museum I lucked into their exhibition of Norman Rockwell Drawings.
There, I was particularly struck by this lovely drawing, Norman Rockwell’s interpretation of the classic theme of artist and model:

Rockwell portrays this artist as a circus contortionist– the opposite of his ramrod straight, expressionless model. We see the artist struggling to infuse his model with a glamorous flourish where none exists.
Look at what’s taking place in this tiny space: the artist holds the magic charcoal with a highly affected grasp, inventing a sweep of the hair and alluring eyes that aren’t on the model.
![]() |
| This is what a hand looks like when it’s trying to change reality with sheer force of will |
Note how the artist cocks his head way back to give him the perspective necessary to find glamour in his bland and boring model. The artist’s pretentious beret tells us much about his self-image…
.jpg)
But his saggy pants, frayed cuffs and worn shoes tell us more about the reality of the situation:
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)


We are told that his drawings are rich with visual and psychological subtleties, and I believe that to be true but I also believe that pretentious art critics, clinging to their own affectations, tend to overlook the rich field of visual and psychological subtleties in more representational art.
.jpg)